当前在线人数9807
首页 - 博客首页 - 美国医学教育博客 - 文章阅读 [博客首页] [首页]
关于临床孕妇拒绝剖腹产的有关美国法律问题
作者:USMedEdu
发表时间:2007-11-28
更新时间:2007-11-29
浏览:1656次
评论:0篇
地址:10.
::: 栏目 :::
现代医学vs“中医”
社会、艺术与医学
住院/FELLOW单位
中外医学网站精选
国内外医学交流信息
生物医学人物
力刀美加医学教育专
临床见习/实习/义工
医学生理学诺贝尔奖
医生助理(PA)职业
医学书籍照片及图谱
社会与医学瞬间定格
医学典故/医史杂谈
USMLE复习和考试
申请和面试住院医生
住院医生生活和工作
FELLOWSHIP
医生就业、工作及生
医学科普及问题解答
美加医学院申请/MCA
中美医学临床教育比
医学新进展及新闻
社会医学伦理

关于临床孕妇拒绝剖腹产的有关美国法律问题
jimmyzhang

医生是不是可以(或者需要)在孕妇(/家属)拒绝的情况下,为了胎儿的利益而做剖腹产手术?这个问题被最近在中国发生的一个案例炒得很热。有所谓法律专家煞有介事地出来胡说八道美国如何如何,跟我们在美国学到的医疗伦理学原则大相迳庭。Patient autonomy 是 usmle 考试的一个很基本的伦理学问题, 1987年发生在美国首都乔治华盛顿大学医学中心的一个案例,明确而彻底地回答了为了胎儿的利益而做剖腹产手术的问题,从此以后,医院和医生再也不需要通过法庭来决定是否可以做剖腹产手术。
1、A fetus cannot have rights in this respect superior to those of a person who has already been born.
2、Appellate court decisions have rejected the argument that a pregnant woman has a legal duty to guarantee the health and well-being of her fetus.
3、The District of Columbia Court of Appeals also rejected that a woman who \"has chosen to lend her body to bring [a] child into the world\" has an enhanced duty to assure the welfare of the fetus, sufficient even to require her to undergo Caesarean surgery.
有兴趣了解更多细节的,请参考下面链子一篇1991年的文章:
http://www.advocatesforpregnantwomen.org/articles/angela.htm

No more court orders, no more arguements. It is pregnant women\'s right to refuse
C-section.
------------------------------
In recent years physicians in various parts of the country began appealing
to the courts when pregnant women refused to undergo treatment on behalf of
their fetus. In the majority of cases, the courts sided with physicians and
ordered women to undergo cesareans against their will. However, appellate
decisions (which hold the force of law) have since upheld the right of
pregnant women to refuse treatment, even in situations where their physician
believes the life of the fetus to be threatened.

The most widely cited case, In Re. A.C., involved Angela Carder, a pregnant
cancer patient who fused to consent to a cesarean at 25 weeks gestation
and stated that she wanted to undergo cancer treatment instead, which her
doctors believed would kill her fetus. Officials at George Washington
University Hospital intervened and obtained a court order to force her to
undergo a cesarean that neither she nor her baby survived. Her estate
appealed the decision and won. The Court of Appeals upheld the right of
pregnant women to make all medical decisions on behalf of themselves and
their fetuses, arguing that to compel invasive treatment on pregnant women
would give fetuses rights superior to those of the mother and diminish the
rights of born children whose parents could not, by law, be forced to
undergo surgery or donate organs on their behalf. The court further ruled
that the viability of the fetus and any potential harm the mother might
cause to it by refusing treatment could not override her fundamental right
to bodily integrity and informed consent/refusal.

It’s important for VBAC mothers to know that the Carder ruling has had a
very chilling effect on the willingness of doctors or hospitals to use the
courts to force women to undergo cesareans. Many continue to use the
prospect of a court order as a threat to coerce women to consent, but
hospitals, doctors, and their attorneys are well aware that, should they
proceed and should the mother decide to appeal, they’re looking at a long
and expensive legal battle that they will lose in the end. Any VBAC mother
who’s threatened with a court-ordered cesarean should inform staff that she
knows that it’s an empty threat, that case law is on her side, and that
she plans to appeal the ruling all the way to the Supreme Court if need be.

Cited from: International Cesarean Awareness Network, Inc.
Enforcing and Promoting the Rights of Women Seeking Vaginal Birth After
Cesarean (VBAC): A Primer

[上一篇] [下一篇] [发表评论] [写信问候] [收藏] [举报] 
 
暂无评论
 
用户名: 密码:
发表评论
评论:
[返回顶部] [刷新]  [给USMedEdu写信]  [美国医学教育博客首页] [博客首页] [BBS 未名空间站]
 
Site Map - Contact Us - Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy

版权所有BBS 未名空间站(mitbbs.com) since 1996